| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Lexus RX and 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2009 | |
| Model | Lexus RX | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,741 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,770 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,885 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,684 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,895 kg | 1,600 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 66 L | 7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 993 mm | 942 mm | 51 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,410 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,095 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 958 mm | 937 mm | 21 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 848 mm | 87 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,029 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,133 L | 351 L | -350 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,274 L | 12.4 | -10.4 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lexus RX
| 2015 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lexus RX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lexus RX.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
just ok see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
too tight back there. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Lexus models.
