| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Lincoln MKC and 2016 Ford Transit Connect Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
| Model | Lincoln MKC | Ford Transit Connect | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,690 mm | 3,063 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,552 mm | 4,818 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,864 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,656 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,720 kg | 1,805 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 59 L | 60 L | -1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,191 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,422 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,382 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,036 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 1,146 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,341 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 955 mm | -20 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,049 mm | -1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,430 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,194 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 889 mm | -889 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 714 L | 561 L | 153 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.2 | 1,668 L | 24.2 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,504 L | 2,951 L | -1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC
| 2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Seat comfort can be highly subjective, partly because human bodies come in many different shapes and sizes. This said, the MKC's driver seat fit me like a glove from the moment I first sat down. The seat bottom is cushier than most, including those in the Acura and Audi, while the seatback is very well contoured. You'll find more lateral support in the Acura, but the Lincoln's seats offer as much as owners are likely to need in a compact crossover. The view forward from this seat is better than in the Ford Escape, as the MKC's windshield doesn't seem as steeply raked and doesn't have oddly curved, fishbowl-effect lower corners. Also, the top of the Lincoln's instrument panel better disguises its considerable depth. The instrument panels in the Acura and in German competitors require no such artful disguising, as they aren't nearly as deep. To the rear, the MKC's windows are at least as small as the Escape's, and smaller than the Acura's and the Audi's. Luckily the side mirrors are large and blind spot warning is an option. see full Lincoln MKC review | |
| 2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the Lincoln MKC's key weakness is at least as apparent as any of its strengths once one moves beyond the official specs--likely cheated, per Ford's recent practice--and actually sits in its rear seat. The Escape is tighter than most back there, and the MKC is tighter still. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees come within a couple inches of the front seatbacks. Put a tall driver up front, and I wouldn't fit in back. Nearly all competitors have roomier rear seats. You'll find far more shoulder room and rear knee room in the RDX. Perhaps Lincoln should have stretched the MKC's wheelbase a few inches to expand the rear seat. As is, it's about four inches shorter than the RDX, Q5, and Volvo XC60. A roofline an inch lower than the Escape's might improve the exterior's proportions, but it cuts into interior space. see full Lincoln MKC review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Transit Connect.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Lincoln models.
