Model Year | 2006 | 2014 | |
Model | Lincoln Navigator | Mercedes-Benz GL | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 118.8 in | 121.0 in | -2.2 in |
Length | 207.5 in | 201.6 in | 5.9 in |
Width | 78.7 in | 76.4 in | 2.3 in |
Height | 77.7 in | 72.8 in | 4.9 in |
Curb Weight | 5555 lb. | 5401 lb. | 154 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 28.0 gal. | 26.4 gal. | 1.6 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.6 in | 41.2 in | -1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.3 in | 58.5 in | 4.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.9 in | 0.0 in | 57.9 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 40.3 in | 0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 40.0 in | -0.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 63.4 in | 58.3 in | 5.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 0.0 in | 58 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 38.7 in | 38.5 in | 0.2 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.8 in | 38.9 in | -1.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 52.3 in | 50.5 in | 1.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 50.2 in | 0.0 in | 50.2 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 35.0 in | 1.3 in |
Total Legroom | 116.2 in (over 3 rows) | 113.8 in (over 3 rows) | 2.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 18.3 ft3 | 16.0 ft3 | 2.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 54.6 ft3 | 49.4 ft3 | 5.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 104.8 ft3 | 93.8 ft3 | 11 ft3 |
2006 Lincoln Navigator Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The rear console is a bad idea. There's no way for the kids to get to the back seat while driving. see full Lincoln Navigator review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic RWD |
The driver's seat is exceedingly comfortable. Its heating and cooling features work quickly and effectively. The adjustable lumbar support is in the right place to be effective without being intrusive, and the large cushion effectively supports the my legs. As an athlete who is almost always sore or injured, I very much appreciate that the seat is high enough off the floor that my lower legs are reasonably vertical. see full Lincoln Navigator review |
2014 Mercedes-Benz GL Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference. The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped. Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me. see full Mercedes-Benz GL review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL.