Mazda CX-3 (2016) vs. Tesla Model 3 (2017) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2017 Tesla Model 3 specs.
2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2017 Tesla Model 3 Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2017 |
|
Model |
Mazda CX-3 |
Tesla Model 3 |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
101.2 in |
113.2 in |
-12 in |
Length |
168.3 in |
184.8 in |
-16.5 in |
Width |
69.6 in |
72.8 in |
-3.2 in |
Height |
60.7 in |
56.8 in |
3.9 in |
Curb Weight |
2809 lb. |
3549 lb. |
-740 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
12.7 gal. |
0.0 gal. |
12.7 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
38.4 in |
39.6 in |
-1.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
53.5 in |
56.3 in |
-2.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
52.3 in |
0.0 in |
52.3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
41.7 in |
42.7 in |
-1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
37.2 in |
37.7 in |
-0.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
50.4 in |
54.0 in |
-3.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
49.0 in |
0.0 in |
49 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
35.0 in |
35.2 in |
-0.2 in |
Total Legroom |
76.7 in (over 2 rows) |
77.9 in (over 2 rows) |
-1.2 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
12.4 ft3 |
15.0 ft3 |
-2.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
44.5 ft3 |
15.0 ft3 |
29.5 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3
2016 |
The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring.
The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO.
Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest.
see full Mazda CX-3 review |
2016 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable.
The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference.
According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows.
see full Mazda CX-3 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-3.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Tesla Model 3
2018 |
4dr Sedan 258-horsepower Electric 1-speed automatic RWD |
The 12 way power driver and passenger seats are very comfortable and the side bolstering is just right. The "vegan leather" in the car feels softer than real leather. I don't know how well it will hold up. My Prius has another type of this leather and that driver's seat has held up better than any leather seat I've sat in.
see full Tesla Model 3 review |
2017 Tesla Model 3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2018 |
4dr Sedan 258-horsepower Electric 1-speed automatic RWD |
The back seat cushion is too low, which means there is no thigh support and your knees are level with your chest. There is also no foot room, but there is enough leg room. The rest of the backseat is comfortable, but the lack of foot room and low cushion are annoying.
see full Tesla Model 3 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Mazda models.