Model Year | 2021 | 2017 | |
Model | Mazda CX-30 | Chevrolet SS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,654 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,394 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,796 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,567 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,467 kg | 1,813 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 51 L | 71 L | -20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 968 mm | 983 mm | -15 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,412 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,387 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 965 mm | 8 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,361 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,351 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 922 mm | 1,008 mm | 921 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,981 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 572 L | 464 L | 108 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,280 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2021 Mazda CX-30.
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |