Mazda CX-5 (2019) vs. Acura RDX (2012) Specs

vs.

◆

2019 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Acura RDX Specifications

Model Year	2019	2012
Model	Mazda CX-5	Acura RDX
Engine	turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 310 lb-ft@2000	turbocharged 2.3L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@6000 260 lb-ft@4500
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	5-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	AWD	AWD
Body	4dr SUV	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,697 mm	2,649 mm	0 mm
Length	4,549 mm	4,590 mm	0 mm
Width	1,842 mm	1,869 mm	0 mm
Height	1,659 mm	1,656 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	1,735 kg	1,783 kg	0 kg
Fuel Capacity	56 L	68 L	-12 L
Headroom, Row 1	1,008 mm	983 mm	-982 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,450 mm	1,478 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,402 mm	1,382 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,041 mm	1,062 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	991 mm	973 mm	18 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,392 mm	1,430 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,405 mm	1,346 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	1,006 mm	955 mm	-954 mm
Total Legroom	2,047 mm (over 2 rows)	2,017 mm (over 2 rows)	0 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	875 L	787 L	88 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	1,688 L	1,716 L	0 L

2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.

2012 Acura RDX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2011	4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Too little leg room see full Acura RDX review

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.