Model Year | 2018 | 2020 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Ford Expedition | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 3,112 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,549 mm | 5,334 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 2,029 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,659 mm | 1,946 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,616 kg | 2,469 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 88 L | -32 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,648 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,016 mm | 990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,590 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 1,054 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 947 mm | -947 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,631 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,306 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 917 mm | -917 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,012 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 547 L | 328 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.9 | 1,628 L | 29.9 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 2,962 L | -1 L |
2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Ford Expedition.