Model Year | 2019 | 2022 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Ford Explorer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 3,025 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,549 mm | 5,050 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,659 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,606 kg | 1,971 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 68 L | -12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,034 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,570 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,504 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,029 mm | 990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,572 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,387 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,039 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 818 mm | -818 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,883 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 515 L | 360 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.9 | 1,356 L | 29.9 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 2,486 L | -1 L |
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Ford Explorer.