| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2019 Mazda CX-5 and 2011 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2019 | 2011 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,549 mm | 5,154 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,659 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,606 kg | 1,821 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 76 L | -20 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 960 mm | 31 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 968 mm | -967 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 569 L | 306 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 20.1 | -19.1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5
| 2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Ford Taurus
| 2011 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front and rear seats are very comfortable. The back can be cramped with three passengers. The SL has heated front and rear seats which works great and are needed as the car heater is very slow to initially get warm. The heated steering wheel is also a nice touch. The seat fabric is soft but the light color might not wear well. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Leather appointed seats are like sitting in an easy chair. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Independently adjustable lumbar and cushion supports, individual front seat heaters, coolers and massagers for both the seat cushion and the back. Need I say more? see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2011 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
