Model Year | 2019 | 2018 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 3,063 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,549 mm | 4,818 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,659 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,606 kg | 1,805 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 60 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,191 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,146 mm | 990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,049 mm | -1 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,430 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,194 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 889 mm | -889 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 561 L | 314 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.9 | 1,668 L | 29.9 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 2,951 L | -1 L |
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Ford Transit Connect.