| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Mazda CX-5 and 2010 Honda Accord Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2010 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Honda Accord | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 2,799 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,549 mm | 4,930 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,847 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,659 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,606 kg | 1,465 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 70 L | -14 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,438 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,080 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 978 mm | 13 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 945 mm | -944 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,024 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 396 L | 479 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 14.0 | -13 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
| 2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Honda Accord
| 2010 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
6'4" and plenty of head and leg room. Leather seats and lumbar support fit me well. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Another reason I'm glad I got the EX model. The power lumbar on the drivers seat is my backs best friend. Even after 16 hour days and 1100 miles, my back is fine. Excellent seats! see full Honda Accord review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Spacing is good, material use is comfortable. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Even with the front driver and passenger seats move all the way to the back of their tracks and reclined somewhat, there is still plenty of legroom for backseat passengers (even 6 footers). This is really a full size sedan and not a mid-size. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 190-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seats offer plenty of range of motion. They are comfortable for extended periods of time. Side bolsters are not too soft, not to rigid. Just right. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 271-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Placement and tactile feel. see full Honda Accord review |
| 2010 Honda Accord Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Lumbar support is too aggressive, and it is non-adjustable in the LX model. I have gotten used to them, but they are nowhere near the same league as my previously owned Saabs and BMWs. see full Honda Accord review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
