| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,549 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,659 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,606 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 40 L | 16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 991 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 876 mm | -875 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 583 L | 292 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 1,623 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
| 2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
