Model Year | 2015 | 2017 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Infiniti QX60 | |
Engine | 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 184 hp@5700 185 lb-ft@3250 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 295 hp@6400 270 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,901 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,539 mm | 4,989 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,839 mm | 1,961 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,669 mm | 1,742 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,602 kg | 2,050 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 74 L | -18 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 1,034 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,461 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,443 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 973 mm | 18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 1,534 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,364 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 1,059 mm | 997 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 927 mm | -927 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,450 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,067 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 782 mm | -782 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,040 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,916 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 966 L | 447 L | 519 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 34.1 | 1,155 L | 33.1 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,835 L | 2,166 L | -1 L |
2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's no clear winner in rear seat room and comfort, either. The Mazda's rear seat is mounted a little lower than the Toyota's, and when sitting in it my knees are considerably closer (if still not close) to the front seat backs. Also, the Toyota's rear seat reclines, while the Mazda's does not. Neither car has air vents in the rear passenger compartment, but the RAV4 has a large vent high on the instrument panel apparently intended to push cool air into the rear seat via the ceiling. To counter these RAV4 advantages, the CX-5 offers about five inches more rear hip room. So three passengers will fit more comfortably. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Soon after I bought the Mazda, I did an 8 hour trip in it. I found the seat comfort to be most satisfactory. I had no trouble finding a comfortable driving position using the power seat, and, the lumbar support. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2014 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
While recently shopping for a new car for the first time in over 10 years, I found that driver's seats are now made with high sides. For me, a 5'1" female driver, this makes it a bit awkward getting in and out. Combined with the higher ground clearance of a compact SUV, it's not the ideal setup. The Mazda CX-5 is not as bad as others, but it's still an issue. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Infiniti QX60.