Model Year | 2019 | 2014 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Lincoln MKZ | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 310 lb-ft@2000 |
3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@6500 270 lb-ft@4000 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 106.2 in | 112.2 in | -6 in |
Length | 179.1 in | 194.1 in | -15 in |
Width | 72.5 in | 73.4 in | -0.9 in |
Height | 65.3 in | 58.2 in | 7.1 in |
Curb Weight | 3825 lb. | 4002 lb. | -177 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 14.8 gal. | 16.5 gal. | -1.7 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 37.9 in | 1.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.1 in | 57.7 in | -0.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 55.1 in | 0.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 41.8 in | -0.8 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 36.6 in | 2.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.8 in | 55.3 in | -0.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 53.8 in | 1.5 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.6 in | 37.0 in | 2.6 in |
Total Legroom | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 1.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 30.9 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 15.5 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 59.6 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 44.2 ft3 |
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
2014 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
2014 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Ford Fusion. In the Lincoln MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Lincoln MKZ.