Model Year | 2019 | 2015 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Nissan Quest | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 310 lb-ft@2000 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | CVT | |
Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 3,000 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,549 mm | 5,100 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,971 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,659 mm | 1,816 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,735 kg | 1,981 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 76 L | -20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,638 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,113 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,057 mm | 990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,605 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,676 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 932 mm | -931 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,016 mm | -1 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,554 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,260 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,029 mm | -1 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,073 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 994 L | -119 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.9 | 1,801 L | 29.9 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 3,070 L | -2 L |
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
2015 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2014 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 260-horsepower 3.5L V6 CVT FWD |
Here's the main reason I bought this van: my kids! Of all the vans we tested, they believed the second and third row seats were the most comfortable. Some may laugh at the boxy shape and fat rear end of the Quest, but the reason it's designed that way is because it maximizes interior room. I'm 6'1" (taller in the torso than legs) and even I think the van is spacious when I sit in the third row. The head and shoulder room is incredible. The seats are all very comfortable. The soft suspension makes riding as a passenger a pleasure. So, despite all the shortcomings I mention in this review, in my opinion, the Quest tops all the competitors in the category of passenger and driver comfort. The pleasing and luxurious interior materials contribute to this. Too bad the production of this iteration of the Quest appears to be in its final chapter. see full Nissan Quest review |