| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2018 Mazda CX-5 and 2007 Subaru Outback Specifications
| Model Year | 2018 | 2007 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Subaru Outback | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,549 mm | 4,793 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,659 mm | 1,605 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,616 kg | 1,510 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 64 L | -8 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,295 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,120 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 993 mm | -2 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,364 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 861 mm | -860 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,981 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 949 L | -74 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 1,875 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Subaru Outback
| 2007 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Footroom too short. see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
A little tight in the left portion of the footwell; small dead pedal. see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2008 | 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
not long enough for a 6 foot 2 inch frame but I manage see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2007 | 4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
I was amazed at how small the back seat is in this car. Really no bigger than a compact sedan, eg Civic or Corolla. I can't fit my 3 kids (in car seats) back there, and feel bad when co-workers pile in to go to lunch. Surprisingly small for a vehicle this size, and marketed as a "family car." If you plan to put adults or 3 kids back there regularly, look at the '10 or newer (or at something else -- the rear seat in my co-worker's Accord is far bigger and more comfortable). see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Leg and head room lacking for over 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat back a bit low for 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2006 | 4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
Too small for kids see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2006 | 4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Too short! I am 6ft tall and the front passenger seat leaves me feeling very cramped. Drivers position is better. Seats also too narrow. Maybe plenty of room for skinny folks, but not for us folks that are large boned :-) see full Subaru Outback review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
