| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2018 Mazda CX-5 and 2011 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2018 | 2011 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 2,789 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,549 mm | 4,785 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,910 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,659 mm | 1,730 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,616 kg | 1,790 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 73 L | -17 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,516 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,019 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,397 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,074 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 742 mm | -742 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,812 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 292 L | 583 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.9 | 1,198 L | 29.9 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 2,701 L | -1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota Highlander
| 2011 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I am 6 foot tall, and there is plenty of head and leg room in the driving position. Easy access as well. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2011 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
3rd row seats are useless to me. Too little room for adults. Should have been an option for families with small children. With 3rd row seating, you lose storage space. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
