| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.2 in | 102.4 in | 3.8 in |
| Length | 179.1 in | 171.9 in | 7.2 in |
| Width | 72.5 in | 69.5 in | 3 in |
| Height | 65.3 in | 61.4 in | 3.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3541 lb. | 2865 lb. | 676 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.8 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 1.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 40.5 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.1 in | 53.3 in | 3.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 52.3 in | 2.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 41.6 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 39.3 in | -0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.8 in | 52.6 in | 2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 43.7 in | 11.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.6 in | 36.2 in | 3.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 2.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 30.9 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | 11.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 59.6 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | -1.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
| 2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota Matrix
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
