Model Year | 2019 | 2007 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Toyota Sequoia | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 3,000 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,549 mm | 5,179 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,659 mm | 1,869 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,606 kg | 2,309 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 100 L | -44 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,044 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,577 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,516 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,031 mm | 990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 935 mm | -935 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,547 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 757 mm | -757 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 753 L | 122 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.9 | 1,849 L | 29.9 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 3,627 L | -2 L |
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2007 Toyota Sequoia.