Mazda CX-5 (2019) vs. Volvo S40 (2009) Specs

vs.

◆

2019 Mazda CX-5 and 2009 Volvo S40 Specifications

Model Year	2019	2009
Model	Mazda CX-5	Volvo S40
Engine	turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 310 lb-ft@2000	turbocharged 2.5L I5 DOHC-4v 227 hp@5000 236 lb-ft@1500
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	5-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	AWD	AWD
Body	4dr SUV	4dr Sedan
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,697 mm	2,639 mm	0 mm
Length	4,549 mm	4,475 mm	0 mm
Width	1,842 mm	1,770 mm	0 mm
Height	1,659 mm	1,453 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	1,735 kg	1,585 kg	0 kg
Fuel Capacity	56 L	60 L	-4 L
Headroom, Row 1	1,008 mm	988 mm	-987 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,450 mm	1,402 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,402 mm	1,364 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,041 mm	1,057 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	991 mm	945 mm	46 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,392 mm	1,374 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,405 mm	1,288 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	1,006 mm	874 mm	-873 mm
Total Legroom	2,047 mm (over 2 rows)	1,930 mm (over 2 rows)	1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	875 L	357 L	518 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	1,688 L	12.6	-11.6 L

2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Volvo S40.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.