| Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-7 | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,751 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,681 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,646 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,586 kg | 1,651 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 51 L | 11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 1,001 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,417 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 925 mm | 927 mm | -2 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 847 L | 694 L | 153 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,659 L | 1,489 L | 0 L |
| 2010 Mazda CX-7 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Tight seating in rear unless seats are pulled way fwd. see full Mazda CX-7 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford C-MAX.