| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2016 Cadillac ATS Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Cadillac ATS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.2 in | 109.3 in | 3.9 in |
| Length | 200.2 in | 182.8 in | 17.4 in |
| Width | 76.2 in | 71.1 in | 5.1 in |
| Height | 68.0 in | 55.9 in | 12.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 4330 lb. | 3373 lb. | 957 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.1 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 4.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.6 in | 38.6 in | 1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.4 in | 55.2 in | 4.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 53.0 in | 3.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 42.5 in | -1.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 36.8 in | 2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.7 in | 53.9 in | 4.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.0 in | 52.3 in | 3.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.8 in | 33.5 in | 6.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.4 in | 0.0 in | 35.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 56.9 in | 0.0 in | 56.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.7 in | 0.0 in | 43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 32.4 in | 0.0 in | 32.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 113.1 in (over 3 rows) | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 37.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 17.2 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 48.3 ft3 | 10.2 | 38.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 100.7 ft3 | 10.2 ft3 | 90.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
| 2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
