Mazda CX-9 (2012) vs. Chevrolet SS (2017) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2017 Chevrolet SS specs.
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2017 Chevrolet SS Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2017 |
|
Model |
Mazda CX-9 |
Chevrolet SS |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Sedan |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
113.2 in |
114.8 in |
-1.6 in |
Length |
200.2 in |
195.5 in |
4.7 in |
Width |
76.2 in |
74.7 in |
1.5 in |
Height |
68.0 in |
57.9 in |
10.1 in |
Curb Weight |
4330 lb. |
3997 lb. |
333 lb. |
Fuel Capacity |
20.1 gal. |
18.8 gal. |
1.3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 |
39.6 in |
38.7 in |
0.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
59.4 in |
59.1 in |
0.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
56.5 in |
57.2 in |
-0.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 |
40.9 in |
42.3 in |
-1.4 in |
Headroom, Row 2 |
39.0 in |
38.0 in |
1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
58.7 in |
59.0 in |
-0.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
56.0 in |
58.0 in |
-2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 |
39.8 in |
39.7 in |
0.1 in |
Headroom, Row 3 |
35.4 in |
0.0 in |
35.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
56.9 in |
0.0 in |
56.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
43.7 in |
0.0 in |
43.7 in |
Legroom, Row 3 |
32.4 in |
0.0 in |
32.4 in |
Total Legroom |
113.1 in (over 3 rows) |
82 in (over 2 rows) |
31.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
17.2 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
0.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
48.3 ft3 |
16.4 |
31.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
100.7 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
84.3 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Mazda models.