Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2012 Chevrolet Tracker Chevrolet Tracker 2002

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mazda CX-9 (2012) vs. Chevrolet Tracker (2002) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker specs.

2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2002 Chevrolet Tracker Specifications

Model Year 2012 2002  
Model Mazda CX-9 Chevrolet Tracker  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9

2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Tracker

2002 Chevrolet Tracker Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2003 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
very tight for bigger people see full Chevrolet Tracker review
2003 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
small seat, crampted see full Chevrolet Tracker review
2003 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
limited legroom see full Chevrolet Tracker review
2003 4dr SUV 127-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
Its abit small for adults, or large car seats. see full Chevrolet Tracker review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.