| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.2 in | 112.9 in | 0.3 in |
| Length | 200.2 in | 202.9 in | -2.7 in |
| Width | 76.2 in | 76.2 in | 0 in |
| Height | 68.0 in | 60.7 in | 7.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 4330 lb. | 4015 lb. | 315 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.1 gal. | 20.0 gal. | 0.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.6 in | 39.0 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.4 in | 57.9 in | 1.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 56.3 in | 0.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 41.9 in | -1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 37.8 in | 1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.7 in | 56.9 in | 1.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.0 in | 55.8 in | 0.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.8 in | 38.1 in | 1.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.4 in | 0.0 in | 35.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 56.9 in | 0.0 in | 56.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.7 in | 0.0 in | 43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 32.4 in | 0.0 in | 32.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 113.1 in (over 3 rows) | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 33.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 17.2 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | -2.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 48.3 ft3 | 20.1 | 28.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 100.7 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | 80.6 ft3 |
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |