Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 3,063 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 5,085 mm | 4,818 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,935 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,727 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,964 kg | 1,805 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 60 L | 16 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,191 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,146 mm | 990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 1,049 mm | 898 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 1,194 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 889 mm | -66 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 561 L | -74 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 1,668 L | 0 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 2,951 L | 0 L |
2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2015 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect.