Model Year | 2010 | 2020 | |
Model | Mazda CX-9 | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 204 kW@6250 366 Nm@4250 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 186 kW@5000 434 Nm@2500 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,085 mm | 4,549 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,935 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,727 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,062 kg | 1,735 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 56 L | 20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 991 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 875 L | -388 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 30.9 | -29.9 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 1,688 L | 1 L |
2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.