| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Mazda CX-9 and 2015 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2015 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 186 kW@5000 420 Nm@2000 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 137 kW@5700 251 Nm@3250 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,929 mm | 2,700 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,065 mm | 4,539 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,969 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,753 mm | 1,669 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,951 kg | 1,602 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 56 L | 16 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,019 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,461 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 991 mm | -13 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,476 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,458 mm | 1,364 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,019 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 754 mm | 0 mm | 754 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,040 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 408 L | 966 L | -558 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,082 L | 34.1 | -33.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,016 L | 1,835 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-9
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-9.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mazda CX-5
| 2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's no clear winner in rear seat room and comfort, either. The Mazda's rear seat is mounted a little lower than the Toyota's, and when sitting in it my knees are considerably closer (if still not close) to the front seat backs. Also, the Toyota's rear seat reclines, while the Mazda's does not. Neither car has air vents in the rear passenger compartment, but the RAV4 has a large vent high on the instrument panel apparently intended to push cool air into the rear seat via the ceiling. To counter these RAV4 advantages, the CX-5 offers about five inches more rear hip room. So three passengers will fit more comfortably. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mazda CX-5
| 2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Soon after I bought the Mazda, I did an 8 hour trip in it. I found the seat comfort to be most satisfactory. I had no trouble finding a comfortable driving position using the power seat, and, the lumbar support. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
| 2015 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
While recently shopping for a new car for the first time in over 10 years, I found that driver's seats are now made with high sides. For me, a 5'1" female driver, this makes it a bit awkward getting in and out. Combined with the higher ground clearance of a compact SUV, it's not the ideal setup. The Mazda CX-5 is not as bad as others, but it's still an issue. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
