Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
Model | Mazda CX-9 | Nissan Quest | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 186 kW@5000 420 Nm@2000 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 179 kW@5800 328 Nm@4400 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 4-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,929 mm | 3,150 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 5,065 mm | 5,184 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,969 mm | 1,971 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,753 mm | 1,826 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,839 kg | 1,820 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 76 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,064 mm | 997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,618 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,666 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 1,059 mm | 977 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,476 mm | 1,681 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,458 mm | 1,712 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 955 mm | -56 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,019 mm | 1,270 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 754 mm | 1,046 mm | 753 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 3,155 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 408 L | 915 L | -507 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,082 L | 2,483 L | -1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,016 L | 4,211 L | -2 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-9.
2006 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bench back seems kinds stiff after sitting in the captains chairs.That is one thing they could improve. see full Nissan Quest review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
MOST COMFORTABLE VEHICLE FOR 7 PASSENGERS AND THE SKYVIEW MAKES A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. NISSAN RELIABILITY OF THE 3.5L IS RESOUNDING.IF THEY CAN ONLY FIX THE ROTOR ISSUE IT WOULD BE THE BEST VAN ON THE MARKET see full Nissan Quest review |