| Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | 3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 273 hp@6250 270 lb-ft@4250 |
1.8L I4 DOHC-4v 164 hp@7600 126 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,085 mm | 4,351 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,964 kg | 1,270 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 50 L | 26 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,011 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,214 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 922 mm | -921 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 617 L | -130 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 21.8 | -20.8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 1,506 L | 1 L |
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room in rear seats while both front seats are being used, enough room for 5 adults. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |