| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Mazda MX-5 Miata and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2018 | |
| Model | Mazda MX-5 Miata | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 167 hp@7000 140 lb-ft@5000 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 252 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@2500 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | 9-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | 4WD | |
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 91.7 in | 107.3 in | -15.6 in |
| Length | 157.3 in | 182.3 in | -25 in |
| Width | 67.7 in | 72.4 in | -4.7 in |
| Height | 49.0 in | 65.4 in | -16.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 2447 lb. | 3756 lb. | -1309 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 12.7 gal. | 14.9 gal. | -2.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.4 in | 40.0 in | -2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.2 in | 57.2 in | -4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 50.6 in | 54.4 in | -3.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 40.9 in | 2.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 38.5 in | -38.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.6 in | -55.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.8 in | -51.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 39.7 in | -39.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 43.1 in (over 1 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -37.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 5.3 ft3 | 29.6 ft3 | -24.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 5.3 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | -58 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mazda MX-5 Miata
| 2015 Mazda MX-5 Miata Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The most obvious reason not to buy any Mazda MX-5 Miata? The thing that kept me from buying one: no back seat. The MINI Roadster also had not back seat, while the MINI Convertible and Scion FR-S have vestigial perches on which only my smallest child might sit semi-comfortably. In contrast, I can fit all three of my teenagers into my Mazda RX-8. But if my wife also wants to come along, we have to take our other car. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mazda MX-5 Miata
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
| 2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
