Model Year | 2015 | 2012 | |
Model | Mazda MX-5 Miata | Mercedes-Benz GL | |
Engine | 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 167 hp@7000 140 lb-ft@5000 |
4.7L V8 DOHC-4v 335 hp@6000 339 lb-ft@2700 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed manual | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,329 mm | 3,076 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 3,995 mm | 5,095 mm | -2 mm |
Width | 1,720 mm | 1,930 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,245 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,110 kg | 2,425 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 48 L | 98 L | -50 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 950 mm | 1,019 mm | 949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,351 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,285 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,095 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,031 mm | -1 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,496 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,003 mm | -1 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 970 mm | -970 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,283 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 869 mm | -869 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,095 mm (over 1 row) | 2,896 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 150 L | 405 L | -255 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 5.3 | 1,240 L | 4.3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 5.3 | 2,359 L | 3.3 |
2015 Mazda MX-5 Miata Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The most obvious reason not to buy any Mazda MX-5 Miata? The thing that kept me from buying one: no back seat. The MINI Roadster also had not back seat, while the MINI Convertible and Scion FR-S have vestigial perches on which only my smallest child might sit semi-comfortably. In contrast, I can fit all three of my teenagers into my Mazda RX-8. But if my wife also wants to come along, we have to take our other car. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
2012 Mercedes-Benz GL Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference. The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped. Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me. see full Mercedes-Benz GL review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL.