| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata and 2009 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2009 | |
| Model | Mazda MX-5 Miata | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,329 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 3,995 mm | 4,366 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,720 mm | 1,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,245 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,107 kg | 1,300 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 48 L | 50 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 950 mm | 1,029 mm | 949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,351 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,285 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,095 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 998 mm | -998 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,336 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 919 mm | -919 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,095 mm (over 1 row) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 150 L | 561 L | -411 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 5.3 | 1,741 L | 4.3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata
| 2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The first con is the obvious one, and a deal killer for many people. While the FR-S has a barely usable rear seat, the MX-5 Miata has none at all. see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata
| 2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
not for a large peron see full Mazda MX-5 Miata review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Matrix
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Toyota Matrix.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
