| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Mazda RX-8 and 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
| Model | Mazda RX-8 | BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo | |
| Engine | 1.3L R2 OHV-2v 232 hp@8500 159 lb-ft@5500 |
turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 300 hp@5800 300 lb-ft@1300 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed manual | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Coupe | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.4 in | 115.0 in | -8.6 in |
| Length | 175.6 in | 190.0 in | -14.4 in |
| Width | 69.7 in | 72.0 in | -2.3 in |
| Height | 52.8 in | 59.4 in | -6.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3064 lb. | 4010 lb. | -946 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 15.8 gal. | 0.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.2 in | 41.3 in | -3.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.8 in | 55.2 in | -0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 0.0 in | 53.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 42.0 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 38.3 in | -1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.9 in | 54.1 in | 0.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 48.1 in | 0.0 in | 48.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.2 in | 39.2 in | -7 in |
| Total Legroom | 74.9 in (over 2 rows) | 81.2 in (over 2 rows) | -6.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 7.6 ft3 | 18.3 ft3 | -10.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 7.6 | 18.4 ft3 | -10.8 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 7.6 ft3 | 56.5 ft3 | -48.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda RX-8
| 2011 Mazda RX-8 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Coupe 232-horsepower 1.3L R2 6-speed manual RWD |
The R3 Recaro seats had side bolsters that were a bit tight for us. I am below average in size as a male, and my wife is also very small and we found the bolsters cut into our hips far more than was comfortable. The seats are racing oriented only. see full Mazda RX-8 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
| 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Though the latest 3-Series has a much roomier back seat than its predecessors, many people still find it insufficient for their needs, and step up to a midsize sedan or wagon such as the 5-Series or E-Class. Well, most of the 3-Series Gran Turismo's wheelbase stretch was put towards rear seat legroom, bumping it from 35.0 to 37.9 inches. Though a larger car, the E-Class has nearly four inches less total legroom--barely more than the 3 wagon, in fact. (But with a more comfortably positioned rear seat than the 3 wagon.) What the specs don't tell you is that the 3 GT's rear seat cushion, since it is positioned much higher than that in the wagons, provides better thigh support and a much more open view forward. To top it off, the 3 GT's rear seat back reclines. Here again, though, the E-Class wagon has a trick bonus: a rear-facing third-row seat. Though there's not enough headroom back there for anyone over 5-4, the seat is well-padded. If you want to seat seven in a pinch, the E-Class wagon is your only option with a sedan-like driving position (aside from the Tesla Model S). Update: this review originally stated that the 3GT has much more shoulder room than the regular 3-Series, and about as much as the E-Class. But it seems that the initial specs were inaccurate. The latest specs suggest shoulder room in the 3GT is about the same as that in the regular 3-Series. Its interior does feel significantly roomier, though, so the initial specs could yet provide the more accurate set. see full BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
