Mazda RX-8 (2010) vs. Chevrolet SS (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Mazda RX-8 and 2016 Chevrolet SS specs.
2010 Mazda RX-8 and 2016 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year |
2010 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Mazda RX-8 |
Chevrolet SS |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Coupe |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
106.4 in |
114.8 in |
-8.4 in |
| Length |
175.6 in |
195.5 in |
-19.9 in |
| Width |
69.7 in |
74.7 in |
-5 in |
| Height |
52.8 in |
57.9 in |
-5.1 in |
| Curb Weight |
3064 lb. |
3997 lb. |
-933 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity |
15.9 gal. |
18.8 gal. |
-2.9 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
38.2 in |
38.7 in |
-0.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
54.8 in |
59.1 in |
-4.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
53.3 in |
57.2 in |
-3.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
42.7 in |
42.3 in |
0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
36.8 in |
38.0 in |
-1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
54.9 in |
59.0 in |
-4.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
48.1 in |
58.0 in |
-9.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
32.2 in |
39.7 in |
-7.5 in |
| Total Legroom |
74.9 in (over 2 rows) |
82 in (over 2 rows) |
-7.1 in |
| Cargo Volume |
7.6 ft3 |
16.4 ft3 |
-8.8 ft3 |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mazda RX-8
| 2009 |
4dr Coupe 232-horsepower 1.3L R2
6-speed manual RWD |
Very comfortable Recaro seats, even on long drives. Larger people may not be comfortable so beware.
see full Mazda RX-8 review |
| 2009 |
4dr Coupe 232-horsepower 1.3L R2
6-speed manual RWD |
Given the RX-8's compact dimensions, you wouldn't expect rear seat space to be a strength. But thanks to clever packaging and a subtly high roofline, there is actually space for real adults in back, provided those up front are short or move their seats up somewhat.
With a pair of pickup-like rear-opening "half" rear doors, ingress and egress for rear seat passengers is a snap.
For those who want a sports car but have children or need to transport a few friends occassionally, the RX-8 fits the bill nicely.
see full Mazda RX-8 review |
| 2010 Mazda RX-8 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 |
4dr Coupe 232-horsepower 1.3L R2
6-speed manual RWD |
The R3 Recaro seats had side bolsters that were a bit tight for us. I am below average in size as a male, and my wife is also very small and we found the bolsters cut into our hips far more than was comfortable. The seats are racing oriented only.
see full Mazda RX-8 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 |
4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
CoupesSee TrueDelta's information for all
Mazda models.
