| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class and 2020 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2020 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.7 in | 106.2 in | 2.5 in |
| Length | 182.3 in | 179.1 in | 3.2 in |
| Width | 69.7 in | 72.5 in | -2.8 in |
| Height | 56.3 in | 65.3 in | -9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3527 lb. | 3541 lb. | -14 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.4 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 2.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.1 in | 39.7 in | -2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.7 in | 57.1 in | -2.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.3 in | 55.2 in | -2.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 41.0 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.9 in | 39.0 in | -2.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.1 in | 54.8 in | 0.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.9 in | 55.3 in | -0.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.4 in | 39.6 in | -6.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -5.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.4 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -18.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.4 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -47.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
just ok see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
too tight back there. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
| 2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
