Model Year | 2007 | 2016 | |
Model | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | Nissan Murano | |
Engine | 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 170 kW@6000 300 Nm@2700 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 194 kW@6000 325 Nm@4400 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,824 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,531 mm | 4,897 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,727 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,412 mm | 1,692 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,658 kg | 1,778 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 72 L | -10 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 1,013 mm | 987 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,349 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,318 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,107 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 1,011 mm | 946 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,379 mm | 1,494 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 838 mm | 983 mm | -145 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,897 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,090 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 345 L | 1,121 L | 344 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.2 | 1,979 L | 11.2 |
2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
just ok see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2008 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
too tight back there. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2006 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 154hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Rear seats are narrow and hard. The centre seat is only usable for very small people on very short trips. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2006 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
There is no rear seat room. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2006 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
fake leather is too cheap for a m-b. seats too hard. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
2016 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano.