| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class and 2009 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2009 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,715 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,531 mm | 4,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,727 mm | 1,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,412 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,545 kg | 1,480 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 70 L | -8 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 986 mm | 2 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,349 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,318 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 960 mm | -13 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,379 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 838 mm | 973 mm | -135 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,897 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 345 L | 425 L | -80 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2007 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
just ok see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
too tight back there. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 154hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Rear seats are narrow and hard. The centre seat is only usable for very small people on very short trips. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
There is no rear seat room. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
fake leather is too cheap for a m-b. seats too hard. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Camry
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
