| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Mercedes-Benz E-Class and 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz E-Class | Mercedes-Benz GL | |
| Engine | turbocharged 3.0L V6 Diesel DOHC-4v 210 hp@3800 400 lb-ft@1600 |
turbocharged 3.0L V6 Diesel DOHC-4v 210 hp@3400 400 lb-ft@1600 |
|
| Transmission | 7-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 3,076 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,895 mm | 5,095 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,854 mm | 1,930 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,496 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,947 kg | 2,500 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L | 98 L | -18 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 1,019 mm | 972 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,443 mm | 1,496 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 914 mm | 1,003 mm | 913 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 970 mm | -970 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,283 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 869 mm | -869 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,963 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,896 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 580 L | 405 L | 175 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 20.5 | 1,240 L | 19.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,625 L | 2,359 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz E-Class
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz E-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Wagon 302-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Great comfort. Low dash makes seeing out good for my short wife. see full Mercedes-Benz E-Class review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL
| 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference. The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped. Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me. see full Mercedes-Benz GL review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
