| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mercedes-Benz GL and 2006 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz GL | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,076 mm | 2,601 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,095 mm | 4,351 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,930 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,839 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,425 kg | 1,215 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 50 L | 48 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,481 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,313 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,031 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,496 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,214 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,003 mm | 922 mm | -921 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 970 mm | 0 mm | 970 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,283 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 869 mm | 0 mm | 869 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,896 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 405 L | 617 L | -212 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,240 L | 21.8 | -20.8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,359 L | 1,506 L | 1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL
| 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | The Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is just a little longer than the Audi Q7 (201.6 vs. 200.3 inches), and isn't as wide (76.4 vs. 78.1 inches). But the Mercedes is considerably taller (72.8 vs. 68.4 inches) and not nearly as curvy. Which might explain how it is far roomier than the much sleeker Audi. Combined legroom for all three rows is 107.6 inches in the Q7 vs. 113.8 inches in the GL-Class, a large difference. The Q7's space deficit grows the farther back you sit. For adults to even fit in the Audi's third row without extreme discomfort, those in the second row must slide their seats forward to the point that they are themselves short on knee room. While the new GL350's third row sits too low to provide thigh support, it's not nearly as cramped. Further evidence that Audi didn't intend the Q7's third row for frequent use: the second-row seat doesn't do a good job of getting out of the way, making the path in and out of the way-back perhaps the tightest I've experienced. The second-row seat in the GL-Class tips forward to open up a much wider path. If manually tipping the seat is too much of a chore (perhaps because you'e a five-year-old and haven't yet learned to read this), $400 buys a power assist. But even with this option the seat must be manually returned to its upright position, so the point eludes me. see full Mercedes-Benz GL review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz GL.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Matrix
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room in rear seats while both front seats are being used, enough room for 5 adults. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
