| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mercury Grand Marquis and 2014 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2014 | |
| Model | Mercury Grand Marquis | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | 4.6L V8 OHC-2v 224 hp@4800 275 lb-ft@4000 |
Electric 123 hp 189 lb-ft |
|
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 1-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 114.6 in | 98.4 in | 16.2 in |
| Length | 212.0 in | 161.6 in | 50.4 in |
| Width | 78.3 in | 66.7 in | 11.6 in |
| Height | 58.3 in | 60.0 in | -1.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 4135 lb. | 4008 lb. | 127 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 8.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.5 in | 40.4 in | -0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 60.6 in | 52.7 in | 7.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.4 in | 51.5 in | 5.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 41.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 39.0 in | -1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 60.0 in | 51.3 in | 8.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.1 in | 51.3 in | 4.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 34.5 in | 3.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.6 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 3.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.6 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | 0 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 20.6 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -36.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis
| 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Comfort see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Not that crouded feling see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Honda Fit
| 2014 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | The new Honda Fit's first row has a a few more inches of elbow room than those in the Versa Note and Fiesta. Consequently, it feels like a larger car--unless you also need leg room. Then it's no better than the Nissan. Drivers with long legs will wish the front seat could slide back farther--but this would cramp the magic style of the rear seat. Even drivers of middling height (e.g. me) might find the driver seat uncomfortable. The headrest and non-adjustable lumbar bulge both jut well forward. Depending on your personal size and shape, this might or might not be an issue. Pay close attention before you buy. see full Honda Fit review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Honda Fit
| 2014 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2014 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
