Model Year | 2004 | 2011 | |
Model | Mercury Grand Marquis | Mazda RX-8 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2004 Mercury Grand Marquis Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
The bench seats are all day comfortable. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Pretty good rear seat space, and it will fit six people. But the center passengers had better be small. Still, the bench seats are very handy. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
I have a family of six, and in a pinch this car can carry all of us. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2003 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Wanted lots of room. Liked pushbutton pedals positioning, so I can move the front seat forward to increase rear seat room. Front seats are way rearward for safety otherwise. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2003 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Roomy only by positioning the front seats farther forward, but it is possible to make room for rear passengers. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2011 Mazda RX-8 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Coupe 232-horsepower 1.3L R2 6-speed manual RWD |
The R3 Recaro seats had side bolsters that were a bit tight for us. I am below average in size as a male, and my wife is also very small and we found the bolsters cut into our hips far more than was comfortable. The seats are racing oriented only. see full Mazda RX-8 review |