| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Mercury Mountaineer and 2008 Cadillac SRX Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2008 | |
| Model | Mercury Mountaineer | Cadillac SRX | |
| Engine | 4.6L V8 OHC-3v 292 hp@5750 300 lb-ft@3950 |
4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 320 hp@6400 315 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,888 mm | 2,957 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,915 mm | 4,950 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,867 mm | 1,844 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,849 mm | 1,722 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,140 kg | 2,015 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 85 L | 76 L | 9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 975 mm | 8 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,410 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 1,041 mm | 936 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 950 mm | 889 mm | 61 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,349 mm | 1,107 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,151 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 886 mm | 615 mm | 271 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,901 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 385 L | 238 L | 147 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,243 L | 917 L | -916 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,345 L | 1,968 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercury Mountaineer
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Mercury Mountaineer.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Cadillac SRX
| 2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
