We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mercury Mountaineer vs. Chrysler Concorde Fuel Economy (km/L)

The graph does not display if there are fewer than five results.
Chart is based on 13 fuel economy reports for the Mercury Mountaineer and 5 fuel economy reports for the Chrysler Concorde.

Mercury Mountaineer km/L

Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2007 49.4 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2006 36.5 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2006 41.9 MPG Highway Percentage 67 percent Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2005 27.0 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2004 43.7 MPG Highway Percentage 83 percent Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2004 29.4 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2002 39.2 MPG Highway Percentage 51 percent Mercury Mountaineer Mercury Mountaineer 2002 36.5 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2007 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 0 0 30 70 63 49.4  
2006 4dr SUV 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic AWD
flat med none 1 1 88 10 75 36.5  
2006 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat med none 5 7 22 67 68 41.9  
2005 4dr SUV 239-horsepower 4.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 10 80 5 5 70 27.0  
2004 4dr SUV 239-horsepower 4.6L V8
5-speed automatic AWD
flat v.lt none 0 7 10 83 60 43.7  
2004 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat med none 40 30 20 10 60 29.4  
2002 4dr SUV 239-horsepower 4.6L V8
5-speed automatic AWD
flat med hvy 21 16 13 51 75 39.2  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2002 4dr SUV 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic AWD
flat light light 0 40 40 20 60 36.5  

Return to top

Chrysler Concorde km/L

Chrysler Concorde Chrysler Concorde 2004 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Chrysler Concorde Chrysler Concorde 2002 56.9 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Chrysler Concorde Chrysler Concorde 2000 56.9 MPG Highway Percentage 90 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2004 4dr Sedan 234-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat med none 15 15 0 70 100 9.5  
2002 4dr Sedan 250-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
hills light light 7 17 21 55 63 56.9  
2000 4dr Sedan 225-horsepower 3.2L V6
4-speed automatic FWD
flat light none 0 1 9 90 80 56.9  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chrysler Concorde fuel economy data.

Mercury Mountaineer vs. Chrysler Concorde Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Mercury Mountaineer and Chrysler Concorde's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models and Chrysler models.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mercury Mountaineer

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Mercury Mountaineer.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chrysler Concorde

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Chrysler Concorde.

Be the first!