| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2004 Mercury Sable and 2011 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2004 | 2011 | |
| Model | Mercury Sable | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Mercury Sable
| 2004 Mercury Sable Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 155-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Very confortable front and rear seats, driver's seat is very adjustable for comfort. Smooth ride. see full Mercury Sable review |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 155-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Adequate rear room and comfortable. see full Mercury Sable review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
