| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mercury Sable and 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2017 | |
| Model | Mercury Sable | Volkswagen Golf / GTI | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,868 mm | 2,637 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,133 mm | 4,255 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,892 mm | 1,798 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,562 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,665 kg | 1,344 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 50 L | 26 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 975 mm | -974 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,364 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 986 mm | 968 mm | 18 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,361 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,046 mm | 904 mm | -903 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,096 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,951 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 600 L | 646 L | -46 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 21.2 | 1,492 L | 20.2 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercury Sable
| 2009 Mercury Sable Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
nice large car, easy for baby car seat and plenty of leg room for adults see full Mercury Sable review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
roomy seats and you sit up a bit for good visabilty see full Mercury Sable review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
| 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | As I've noted before (when reviewing the e-Golf), the seventh-generation Golf's front seats are shaped and padded to provide nearly ideal comfort and support in daily driving. The CX-5's driver seat also fit me well, but not quite as well as the Volkswagen's. Compared to other compact hatchbacks and its ancestors, the current Golf has a roomy rear seat. I can sit behind my 5-9 self with about five inches of air ahead of my knees. Unless unusually tall people populate both rows, the amount of space should be beyond adequate. Compare the Golf SportWagen's rear seat to that in the CX-5, and a funny thing happens. On paper, the Mazda provides about 3.5 more inches of legroom. When sitting behind myself in both vehicles, though, I had about half as much space ahead of my knees in the CX-5. I've noticed in the past that VW measures rear legroom very conservatively, and apparently they continue to do so. The Golf's interior is roomier than the official specs suggest. Plus its rear seat passengers get air vents. The Mazda's do not. This said, I'm not entirely comfortable in the Golf SportWagen's rear seat. To me it feels overly reclined. In neither the GSW nor the CX-5 is the degree of recline adjustable. It is in some compact crossovers. see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
| 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2016 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 210hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Difficult ingress and egress see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
