| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2016 Ford Ranger Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Lancer | Ford Ranger | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
| 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Ranger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Ranger.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
