| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2017 Ford Edge Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2017 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Ford Edge | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 OHC-4v 172 kW@6250 291 Nm@3750 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 183 kW@5500 373 Nm@3000 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,641 mm | 4,778 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,928 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,742 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,745 kg | 1,850 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 69 L | -6 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,021 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 1,024 mm | 972 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,537 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,461 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,031 mm | 934 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,265 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 993 mm | 0 mm | 993 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 0 mm | 704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 422 L | 1,110 L | 421 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,025 L | 39.2 | -38.2 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,056 L | 2,078 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Ford Edge
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford Edge.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
