| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,641 mm | 5,154 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,540 kg | 1,821 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 76 L | -13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 960 mm | 13 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 968 mm | -33 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,265 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 993 mm | 0 mm | 993 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 0 mm | 704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 422 L | 569 L | -147 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,025 L | 20.1 | -19.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,056 L | 20.1 | -18.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
