| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2006 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2006 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 108.5 in | -3.4 in |
| Length | 183.3 in | 197.6 in | -14.3 in |
| Width | 70.9 in | 73.0 in | -2.1 in |
| Height | 66.1 in | 56.1 in | 10 in |
| Curb Weight | 3274 lb. | 3343 lb. | -69 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.6 gal. | 18.0 gal. | -1.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.6 in | 40.0 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.4 in | 57.3 in | -0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.6 in | 54.5 in | -1.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 40.9 in | 42.2 in | -1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 38.1 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.0 in | 56.6 in | -0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.7 in | 55.7 in | -4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 38.9 in | -1.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.7 in | 0.0 in | 35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 50.6 in | 0.0 in | 50.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 39.4 in | 0.0 in | 39.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 28.2 in | 0.0 in | 28.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | 25.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.3 ft3 | 17.0 ft3 | -6.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 34.2 ft3 | 17.0 | 17.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.3 ft3 | 17.0 ft3 | 46.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Taurus
| 2006 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 153-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Seats are above average in comfort. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 153-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Front seat room is above average. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2005 | 4dr Wagon 153-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
We chose this wagon initially because it was the only sedan we could find that fit 2 carseats and an adult, or 3 carseats comfortably in the rear seat. Also, the two additional seats in the cargo area are nice if there are more kids along. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2005 | 4dr Wagon 153-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Great for long drives, lots of little "smart" features. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
